I follow the release notes and bitterly recognize that in the last decade, almost no improvement was made for the core. You are losing hardcore programmers and scientists this way (cf. Honestly, I am deeply disappointed that TMW tries to satisfy novice engineers instead of providing powerful tools. I saw the tendency that computational scientists use MATLAB less and less because they need the features that other languages' rich ecosystems provide. If they concentrated on the core of MATLAB (things that are unrelated to the IDE), all people could profit from it. What I want to point out is that TMW spends its workforce on implementing many things into MATLAB that simply cannot compete with specialized tools (diff tools, git support, etc.). If someone has to solve complex git-related tasks, they will use a feature-rich editor (such as SmartGit) or will use the command line. Yes, they are important, but supporting tensor operations, introducing state-of-the-art ODE solvers (as Julia's wonderful DifferentialEquations.jl ) would be more useful for a scientist. To me, MATLAB's focus should be on computational mathematics (as it originally was) and not polishing the IDE and other secondary issues. The core numerical algorithms changed very little in the past 20 years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |